THE OLIVE TREE, ANTI-SEMITISM AND BIBLE PROPHECY
At a convention of the Pre-Trib Study Group in Dallas, Dr. John Walvoord presented a paper on the Pre-Tribulation Rapture and Premillennial teaching, including the history of doctrines throughout the Church age. I was very much struck by something that Dr. Walvoord said as he analyzed the transition from widely held pre-millennial views of the early church in the first three centuries to the predominantly amillennial, postmillennial or anti-millennial views that developed afterwards, and it centered around Augustine.
Latent Anti-Semitism Caused Amillennialism
I appreciated especially what Dr. Walvoord said, as quoted from the audio tape of his message, in his analysis of what happened in the case of Augustine:
“Augustine arbitrarily made the millennium non-literal, while everything else was literal. Now as far as I’ve been able to find out, there has never been a book on doctrine that explains this. But there is possibly an explanation. In the first two centuries the church was largely Jewish in its background. They were the evangelists, and they were the apostles. But as the gospel grew, the church became largely Gentile. And, of course the millennium is a time when the Jews are prominent, and it could be that there is a latent anti-Semitism here that they were quite unconscious of, that made them question whether Israel is going to have a literal future like it says. And that, of course, would lead to a non-literal millennial kingdom. In any case, that’s what happened, and the Roman Catholic Church became amillennial, and the Protestant Reformers like Calvin, Luther and others went back to Augustine rather than to the Bible, and adopted amillennialism. They brought in, though, a lot of other things that were important, like “every man a priest” and “interpret the Bible yourself,” and so on, very important doctrines that have been the bulwark of Protestantism. But, it wasn’t until the 19th and 20th Centuries when the Bible Conference movement began, and people began to ask what does the Scripture actually say? It was not until then that premillennialism became a prominent feature in the church–as it is today in some churches, at least. And that’s the background. So we have to understand there’s a long history of this, and we are a minority. We believe the Bible is literally true and they don’t, and we believe we have the facts on our side. That’s why we believe what we believe.”
Thus Dr. Walvoord said it was his impression that it was latent anti-Semitism that caused Augustine and those around him to have this transition in their thinking. That’s a remarkable statement. How in the world can latent anti-Semitism have anything to do with one’s eschatological viewpoint, and how can it impact the eschatological viewpoint of the whole church? Well, I think that it does, and that’s one of the things we are going to be looking at in this article.
There is an inherent connection between one’s attitude toward the Jewish people and Israel and one’s attitude toward the Scriptures and eschatology. How does that happen? It’s an understanding of what the Scriptures teach about the nature of the church, the nature of Israel, and the nature of the Olive Tree. As Dr. Walvoord brought out, at the time of the beginning of the Bible Conference movement, there was a rediscovery of Israel and the promises to Israel in the Scriptures. Some of the early works published in this movement had to deal with the future of Israel, as scholars began to rediscover premillennialism and literal eschatology. Of course many of the amillennialists, including Augustine, would have been shocked if someone were to say they were anti-Semitic, and they would deny it strenuously. And they would say, why, there’s not an anti-Semitic bone in my body! All we want to do (they might say) is to take away the promises that God has given to Israel and apply them to the church! Well, that sounds pretty anti-Semitic to me.Share on Facebook